California, Massachusetts lead WA in life science funding

Amelia Havanec • Feb 6, 2018

Feb 6, 2018

Republish Article

You can republish articles in print or online. Simply copy the HTML below, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline, and credit to Cascade PBS. Republishing of the photos or videos embedded in an article can occur only if the photo or video is a copyright of Cascade Public Media ("CPM") and not of a third party. Photos and videos that are a copyright of CPM are not required to appear in the republished article, but if they are used, they must be embedded where they appear in the original article and must include the attribution to the CPM photographer.

You may reprint in any medium
You may edit only for tense and timeliness
If republishing in print you can edit for length if you follow our print republishing guidelines.
You may write your own headline
Include a byline and shirttail with credit and link to Cascade PBS
Include our tracking pixel
Remove if we ask

          <article>
            <header>
              <hgroup>
                <h1>California, Massachusetts lead WA in life science funding</h1>
                <h2><p>Washington-based life science companies may be prospering, but federal funding for the industry here pales in comparison to what those in California or Massachusetts take home. The Puget Sound Business Journal reports that early-stage life science companies raked in $9.3 million last year from two federal grants from the</p></h2>
              </hgroup>
               <p>By <a href="/author/amelia-havanec-crosscut-com/">Amelia Havanec</a></p> 
              <p><time datetime="2025-02-04T05:00:00-08:00">Feb 6, 2018</time></p>
            </header>
            <p>Washington-based life science companies may be prospering, but federal funding for the industry here pales in comparison to what those in California or Massachusetts take home. The Puget Sound Business Journal<a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/health-care-inc/2015/06/washington-state-life-sciences-industry-trails.html?ref=avalancheghost.one"> reports</a> that early-stage life science companies raked in $9.3 million last year from two federal grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), just 11% and 21% of what California and Massachusetts raked in from the same programs, respectively.The NIH has a reputation for being one of the largest sources of capital for the research these small companies conduct. Venture funding toward local biotech companies is also <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/health-care-inc/2015/04/how-does-washington-states-biotech-industry.html?ref=avalancheghost.one">trailing behind</a>.</p>
          </article>

Washington-based life science companies may be prospering, but federal funding for the industry here pales in comparison to what those in California or Massachusetts take home. The Puget Sound Business Journal reports that early-stage life science companies raked in $9.3 million last year from two federal grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), just 11% and 21% of what California and Massachusetts raked in from the same programs, respectively.The NIH has a reputation for being one of the largest sources of capital for the research these small companies conduct. Venture funding toward local biotech companies is also trailing behind.

Our members' donations make local journalism happen.

Support once for $1

Support monthly for $7

Cascade PBS Passport
Mossback members-only newsletter
Print Viewer Guide (opt-in)

Support monthly for $25

Invitation to quarterly news and original programming video conference
Annual in-person meet-up with news & programming teams
Special event perks (reduced price or free tickets, cocktails, etc.)

Continue

By Amelia Havanec

Amelia Havanec is Crosscut's Science and Tech Fellow. She came to Washington from her home state of Connecticut by way of New York, Florida, California and Michigan in pursuit of the perfect pint. Sh