Advertisement
Politics

Humor: Senate inspires new type of show, 'futility TV'

The U.S. Senate and NASCAR, sure, people find it fascinating to watch that kind of futility. But will people believe a TV show that has the Supreme Court allowing unlimited corporate financing of political campaigns?

Humor: Senate inspires new type of show, 'futility TV'

by

Steve Clifford

The U.S. Senate and NASCAR, sure, people find it fascinating to watch that kind of futility. But will people believe a TV show that has the Supreme Court allowing unlimited corporate financing of political campaigns?

The unexpected success of ABC'ꀙs breakout reality megahit, "The Senate," may precipitate a torrent of copycat shows.

In "The Senate," 100 aging windbags are divided into two tribes, placed in a muggy swamp, and challenged to solve problems through cooperation.

ABC was initially disappointed.  Instead of cooperative problem solving, the tribes engaged in juvenile name-calling, sanctimonious posturing, and pompous bloviating.  While the tribes failed to achieve anything, viewers were oddly attracted.

"Like a ten-car pileup, you have to look," Virginia Heffernan, The New York Times TV critic, explained.  " 'The Senate" is even more riveting.  It is a ten-car wreck where the uninjured drivers ignore the dying and the damaged.  Instead of calling an ambulance, they pontificate, fulminate, and blame the other tribe for the crash."

"The Senate" has become the show you love to hate. Each week over 45 million American tune in to see which tribe can be more hypocritical, demagogic, and inane.

Network executives believe that viewers want more 'ꀜfutility TV'ꀝ — reality shows where nothing happens and everyone acts the fool. "What America wants is Seinfeld with only Kramers," CBS CEO Les Moonves concluded. "They want to watch blathering, incompetent fools accomplishing nothing."

At CBS Moonves has four futility TV reality shows under development:

Court shows, beginning with "People's Court," were the grandfather of reality shows.  In CBS's "Supreme Court," two tribes — The Tight Ass Catholics and The Diversity Ditherers — decide complex constitutional cases.  Since the sphinchterly challenged Catholics outvote the Ditherers 5-to-4, the outcome is never in doubt.  The drama of "Supreme Court" lies in the Tight Asses betraying their legal principles and employing twisted logic to achieve the result they want.

In the pilot, using legal reasoning that would embarrass a first-year law student, the Tight Asses granted corporations the ability to corrupt democratic elections through unlimited campaign spending.  Since this absurd result could never happen in real life, one questions if Supreme Court deserves the label "reality show."

Donation CTA